A couple of painter friends and I meet for coffee every week on the Cape to talk about our work and big questions like what is art. My contribution comes from the period when I was first entering shows and confronting exclusions that suggested that photographs might not be considered art. I wanted to know what terms could be used to enter a rebuttal discussion.
Also, as I was making inkjet prints on watercolor paper from digital files created from scanned negatives, I got myself into the question of just what is a photograph and how to call what I did....what to put on that little line of the entry card that said "medium".
This is what I came up with and have been working by.
First, I would hesitate to call this a definition of art...maybe elements.
Elements
1. the artist or subject.
2. the object...something the artist/subject engages with or reacts to. might be the artist him/herself. The easy example to imagine is a painter looking at an inspiring scene. We have subject and object.
3. the medium. what stuff is the subject going to use to convey something about the engagement with the object? Oil on canvas? Clay? Ink on paper? Sounds on a flute? Body motions?
4. the method. highly related to medium, but not the same. paper is a medium. painting on it is a method. printing on it using an engraved plate is another method. drawing on it is another method.
5. the art. this is the hardest part. something intangible that results from the artists engagement with the object and takes form in their application of method to the medium and elicits a reaction in the viewer/audience.
6. the audience. art is not complete without an audience. maybe art does not exist without an audience. if a tree falls in the forest and there is noone to see the painting I made of it, is the painting art? But this is a little sterile. It is not just the existence of the audience, but what happens in the soul of the audience when confronted with the art. Is it shocked? Stimulated? Pleased? Inspired? Amused? Turned on? Made thoughtful?
What is more important....what Leonardo did to make the Mona Lisa, or what the Mona Lisa does to us? Not sure, but if there were no "us" there might be a Mona Lisa, but it wouldn't be art.
Labels
1984
2012 calendar
2013 calendar
abstract
aesthetics
agnostic
Alfred Glover
Alfred Stieglitz
Ansel Adams
apollo
aquinnah
art
art form
art show
artists' circle
arts foundation
back river
barlow
beacon street
bicycles
boston
boston marathon
bourne
brewster
brookline
budapest
cambridge
cape cod canal
Cape Neddick
captain Kidd
cat boat
cataumet
cataumet arts center
chapoquoit
chilmark
Christ lutheran church
climate change
coolidge corner
cotuit center
county galway
county mayo
cranberry
Desiree Davila
doo lough
easter
eastham
Edward Weston
falmouth
faust
firenze
florence
freedom
Geraldine Mills
goethe
green line
harvard square
harvest
hen cove
Henry Peach Robinson
herreshoff
highland light
iran
ireland
japan
kamaishi
Kesennuma
khorasan
kittery point
lough mask
lough nafooey
louisburgh
Maine
martha's vineyard
Mary Colt
menemsha
minamisanriku
mistakes
monk's cove
monument beach
mounting a large print
nauset light beach
Ned Manter
new bedford
newcomb hollow
newport
Newtown
nobska
north falmouth
nubble
ofunato
old silver beach
orleans
pamet river
parker's boatyard
patuisset
persian rug
philippines
photography
phusion
pictorialism
pienza
pocasset
privacy
prometheus
provincetown
quissett
quissett harbor boatyard
red bicycle
religion
rikuzentakata
robert manz
robert manz studio
roonagh
Sandwich
Shapiro
skaket
so big
squibnocket
studio
suffering
sunrise
sunset
surf drive
thanksgiving
the harvest
theory
truro
tuscany
umbrella
val d'orcia
village market
vinci
war
wellfleet
west falmouth
west tisbury
woods hole
yamadamachi
York
No comments:
Post a Comment